PDA

View Full Version : PICTURES STOLEN *please read*



Ms. CrackerHead
12-31-2009, 02:30 AM
*Before you read this, just note that I am posting this as a warning due to the fact that your weight loss pictures ARE viewable by guests and I think they should not be! They should be protected at least from this kind of situation where guests can steal them for who knows what purpose. Let's suggest to the board that they make them viewable only to the members! And then maybe I'll post some, too! ;)*


Weight loss ad steals Denver dieter's pictures

posted by: Sara Gandy Deborah Sherman 58 days ago

DENVER - Christine Montemayor lost 130 pounds on the South Beach Diet. But she soon learned that her loss was someone else's gain.

A Web site stole her before-and-after-pictures, claiming she had shed her weight using a supplement called Acai Berry.

"People are giving them money because of me. Without my permission," Denver resident Montemayor said. "Someone thinks that what I did can happen with Acai Berry."

Montemayor discovered her weight-loss pictures on the ads after a South Beach supporter e-mailed her and complained.

"She was actually kind of upset in the message. She's like, 'What are you doing? Are you selling your pictures around? This is awful.' And I emailed her back and said 'I have no idea what you're talking about. I would never do that," she said.

On one ad, the business changed Montemayor's name to Brittany from Denver who lost 36 pounds. In another ad, her named was changed to Jillian Rogers from Denver who lost 52 pound with Acai Berry.

"It talks about how I have three children, I don't have three children," Montemayor said. "It said I had lost 57 pounds, in reality I've lost 130 pounds. The whole thing was completely fake."

She called the advertiser, Biolabs in South Florida, to complain. But the company never returned her calls. 9Wants to Know tracked down the distributor, FWM Laboratories in Fort Lauderdale. The company's attorney says it is a victim like Christine.

That's because it hired several smaller businesses, called 'affiliates,' to advertise their products and push traffic to their Web site. The affiliates earn pennies for every click or sale on the Web site. The affiliates are supposed to follow FTC regulations against unfair and deceptive trade practices, but some do not.

"FWM does not condone this affiliates behavior... FWM never requested or even permitted this type of advertising to be posted in a way that would direct traffic to FWM," attorney Bradley Gross who represents FWM Labs said. "This is improper behavior by the affiliate... and from FWM's point of view, this type of stuff makes the whole industry look very bad."

Gross says FWM contacted the affiliate network company and ordered payments to be stopped to the guilty affiliate. It is almost impossible to determine the responsible people behind the advertising because they hide behind ever-changing Web site companies, Gross said.

Some Web sites claim they are sponsored by the Chef Rachael Ray or touted by Oprah or Dr. Phil. But if you read the fine print located somewhere on the Web sites, it reads, "Celebrities neither endorse nor sponsor any of the products and/or services."

"You simply can't take someone else's picture and use it for commercial purposes without their permission. And that is what many affiliates do," Gross said. "It usually ends up driving a great deal of traffic to the Web site. It often succeeds so that's a profit motive for the affiliates to do that."

Meantime, Montemayor is wondering how long her pictures will be on the Internet. She worked hard to lose her weight, but there's no way she can take off the false claims.

"It never occurred to me that anyone would do anything negative with the pictures. It never occurred to me to copyright them," Montemayor said.

Experts say the only way to protect your photos online is to not post them at all. However, using watermarks or a tool called 'shrink-wrapping' makes it more difficult for someone to claim the picture as their own.

Congress is now considering legislation that would regulate some online advertising. Since most people don't realize the web companies are tracking their online habits in order to target direct advertising at them, the bill by Rep. Rich Boucher, D-Va., would let consumers know what information is being collected about them and give them a choice to not be tracked.

If you have any news tips, please e-mail 9Wants to Know Investigative Reporter Deborah Sherman at 9NEWS.com


(Copyright KUSA*TV, All Rights Reserved)

Ms. CrackerHead
12-31-2009, 03:02 AM
Right now the way this web site is set up, ANYBODY can look at the pictures folder and steal OUR pictures. This is dangerous. I offer my post that I uploaded today regarding stolen pictures. Please read it.

It has been in the news lately how pictures from weight loss forums are being stolen. I am strongly suggesting that we change access to the forums pictures. This change would make it less likely for pictures to be stolen by guests if the photos were accessible by ONLY registered members.

Thank you for your consideration and please let me know what you think.

Ms. C

1pdadmin
12-31-2009, 03:16 AM
Dear Ms. Crackerhead

Thank you for taking the time to post this warning. Please be advised that we fully agree with you about the rights of members to the copyrights of their photos. Blocking read access from non-members is not an option if we want to spread the word about the success of this program and helps as many people as possible.

Thank you

Samantha
12-31-2009, 09:35 AM
Wow!! Who would of though it, that another company will steal the photos from here and use it on their own!!!!
What about the admin looking at putting a "watermark" on the photos on this site so that if they are downloaded they will appear with a huge 1PD across them? Sam

Ms. CrackerHead
01-02-2010, 07:14 PM
That's a good idea, Sam. There has to be an easy solution, besides not uploading or just taking the chance.

Dayanira
01-03-2010, 12:31 AM
I totally support that idea Sam! C'mon Admin we know you can do it! We need some kind of protection from you guys!

Key
01-04-2010, 09:07 AM
I agree that our pictures should be secured - and not just because they can be used in dieting frauds... my brother-in-law's picture and identity (fortunately not his financials) was stolen off of his blog and used in an Internet dating scam. He's gone through a mess trying to re-establish himself as a good guy.

mom4morgan
01-04-2010, 02:38 PM
This is a huge concern! I would never want that to happen to me..... I worked hard for this and don't want anything to bad to happen! If nothing can change, at least help me know what to do to remove my photos from here! That would definitely protect me!

1pdadmin
01-05-2010, 12:57 PM
Ladies,

Thank you for your input. No photos were “stolen” from our forum – to the best of my knowledge. Should that happen, we will proceed in demanding the removal of those photos immediately. I also suggest not mixing identity theft with photo copy as these are different matters. Implementing the idea of water-mark by Admin will require adding a process of graphical editing and slow the posting process. I think that in order to save time, those members who are concerned about photo theft will water mark their own photos with a “1PD” , the way they want it.

I want to thank you again for contributing your ideas and input to the forum.

Thank you

1PD Admin

Ms. CrackerHead
01-09-2010, 03:37 PM
Thanks for your response 1pdadmin. I will see what I can find out about watermarking pictures.